Is Privacy Necessary in Psychotherapy?
Read the Reactions of:
- The Supreme Court of the United States
- Two Directors of the New York Psychoanalytic Society
- President of the American Psychiatric Association
- Dr. Donna Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services
- Wall Street Journal
- Consumer Reports
- Medical Economics Magazine
- National Coalition for Patient Rights
- Hartford Courant
- Professional Psychology: Research and Practice
Supreme Court of the United States Jaffee v. Redmond 95-266
“Effective psychotherapy…depends upon an atmosphere of confidence and trust in which the patient is willing to make a frank and complete disclosure of facts, emotions, memories, and fears. Because of the sensitive nature of the problems for which individuals consult psychotherapists, disclosure of confidential communications made during counseling sessions may cause embarrassment…For this reason, the mere possibility of disclosure may impede development of the confidential relationship necessary for successful treatment…
The psychotherapist privilege serves the public interest by facilitating the provision of appropriate treatment for individuals suffering the effects of a mental or emotional problem.”
But Therapist reports to Managed Care &
Insurance Companies destroy privacy
To the Editor,
…Your headline implies that a psychotherapeutic process can be established with or without privacy. This is simply not true. Without privacy there can be no more effective psychotherapy than there can be a fully functional doctor/patient – , priest/parishioner – , or attorney/client relationship. Patients must be made aware that when they invite care managers into their therapies the effort may be entirely vitiated… The entire process will be skewed, details omitted, truths bent, and a less than fully open atmosphere established. Such an atmosphere spells certain death to the difficult psychotherapeutic tasks of openness, honesty, trust and confidence.
Richard M. Gottlieb, M.D.
Chairman, Scientific Program Committee
The New York Psychoanalytic Society
To the Editor,
Your article speaks to the very critical issue facing all of us: the danger to the effective conduct of psychotherapy which results from the loss of privacy and confidentiality [under managed care]. In the Jaffee v. Redmond decision, the Supreme Court ruled that psychotherapy cannot be conducted unless the patient’s privacy (i.e., the confidentiality of the interaction with the therapist) is assured. Your article makes clear that only those individuals who can afford private care, without third-party reimbursements, can fully assure themselves of complete privacy….
Leon Hoffman, M.D.
Director, Parent Child Center, New York Psychoanalytic Society
Herbert S. Sacks, M.D. (President-elect): The New York Times, Sunday, October 27, 1996, “Connecticut Section”.
“One grave concern we have has to do with…the demands of managed care organizations for full medical records. They claim they need them for accountability. That is not true. … There are leaks all over the place. In my private practice dealing with … patients who work in corporations, banks and the media, perhaps half of them who have coverage will not use it. They pay out of pocket because of their concern about these breaches, because of what they observe in their own workplaces.”
Donna E. Shalala, Ph.D. (Secretary of H.H.S.) from National Public Radio feature of August 26, 1997.
“My video card has more federal protections for the privacy of those records than my health care card does… There are no federal protections, there are no standards to protect my health records.”
National Public Radio continues… “Some clinics and many pharmacies sell lists of their customers as do insurance companies and health management and billing companies. There are simply no national laws saying who can and who cannot use this information for non-medical reasons. Two of the nation’s biggest drug companies also run management firms for HMO’s so they have access to patient medical records, and at the same time a tempting supply of potential customers whose addresses and medical information they already know.”
NPR then quotes Dr. Rindfleisch, an expert on medical information from Stanford University: “the sensitivity of health care information is probably higher than in other areas. For example, issues of substance abuse, issues of psychiatric care, issues of sexual activities… that can affect profoundly our relationship to our employers and to the society around us”. NPR then paraphrases Dr. Rindfleisch, “the information can be used to the patient’s detriment. Insurance companies might decide not to insure a patient… employers might use information when making decisions about hiring and promoting.”
“It’s none of your business.
So say a growing number of patients who are deciding not to submit health-insurance claims for psychotherapy, preferring to pay bills out-of-pocket to keep their sessions private.
Under managed care, therapists must file reports about their patients to case managers, who review the clinician’s observations and recommend a treatment plan before approving insurance benefits. Therapists also must submit frequent progress reports, and sometimes even share their notes about what patients have confided in them.”
“A few years back, a University of Illinois study of Fortune 50 corporations found that fully half of the companies surveyed used employee medical records in making employment-related decisions. And of those, nearly 20 percent didn’t inform the employee. A 1991 survey of the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment found that almost a third of the employers that maintained employee medical records let their personnel departments read those records without notifying the employee.
“…managed-care companies — which fund more than a third of all visits to psychotherapists — frequently balk at reimbursing extensive therapy without exhaustive information about the ailments of the patients. Where once a simple, standard psychiatric diagnosis was enough for therapy to be authorized, mental health insurers today want the nitty-gritty details, therapists say. “The more specific you are, the more dirty laundry you give them, the more approvals you get,” says Jennifer Katze, a Baltimore psychiatrist.
Therapy patients, as a rule, do not trust the unseen bureaucrats who examine these records… As a result, patients increasingly pay for therapy themselves, cutting the insurers out of the equation.”
“Margo P. Goldman, M.D., is National CPR’s [Coalition for Patient Rights] director of policy development and a practicing psychiatrist. She answered [a therapist’s question about privacy and insurance forms] this way:
‘In a nutshell, most insurance claim forms have an authorization for the patient to sign to release information to process a claim. Because there are no rules about what information is enough, this could range from basic claim information to the entire patient record,’ Goldman said…. ‘The only way now to prevent an insurer from accessing therapy information is for the patient to pay privately for his or her treatment.”
“The surgeon general’s report on mental health released Monday warns that managed care and information technology have threatened the confidentiality between therapists and clients. The erosion of privacy, the report says, will make people less likely to seek treatment, and less likely to honestly disclose their symptoms if they do see a therapist. ‘It’s a very scary issue for us,’ said Mary Graham of the National Mental Health Association, and one of the top reasons that Americans who could benefit from therapy are staying away. Increasingly, she said, therapists are being required to routinely submit to managed care organizations the most personal and detailed information about their clients’ mental state and personal problems. Often that information is transmitted by fax, e-mail, and, in some cases, over the Internet, and stored in huge data banks….
‘One study of Fortune 500 companies says that 30 percent acknowledge using medical information they had acquired in hiring and promotion decisions, and only half of them told people they were doing it,” said John Ringwald, a clinical psychologist…
From “Confidentiality Limits of Managed Care and Clients’ Willingness to Self-Disclose” by Thomas G. Kremer and Ellis L. Gesten (1998, pp. 553-558)
“The impact of managed care requirements on clients’ willingness to disclose [talk about revealing personal matters] was quite powerful, indicating that psychologists may be deprived of significant amounts of client information due to fears about confidentiality infringements…The implication that managed care clients may be unwilling to disclose therapeutically relevant, even necessary, information presents a serious challenge for practicing psychologists…Only when the psychotherapeutic relationship is given its necessary respect and freedom from constraint can therapy be truly effective for all concerned.”